<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (2) TMI 935 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=392491</link>
    <description>The tribunal upheld the penalty imposed by the AO for deliberate and conscious inadmissible claims under sections 80IB and 80G, confirming tax evasion. However, the penalty for non-deduction of TDS on professional fees was deleted as the assessee made proper disclosure and acted bona fide. The appeal was partly allowed, affirming the penalty for inadmissible deductions and removing the penalty for non-deduction of TDS.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 17 Feb 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 21 Feb 2020 12:41:39 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=604701" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (2) TMI 935 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=392491</link>
      <description>The tribunal upheld the penalty imposed by the AO for deliberate and conscious inadmissible claims under sections 80IB and 80G, confirming tax evasion. However, the penalty for non-deduction of TDS on professional fees was deleted as the assessee made proper disclosure and acted bona fide. The appeal was partly allowed, affirming the penalty for inadmissible deductions and removing the penalty for non-deduction of TDS.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 17 Feb 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=392491</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>