<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (2) TMI 927 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=392483</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal for statistical purposes, emphasizing the need for a thorough re-examination by the AO in light of additional evidence. The judgment highlighted the importance of considering the business purpose behind advances from subsidiaries in determining tax treatment under the Income Tax Act.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 22 Jan 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 21 Feb 2020 12:29:10 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=604692" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (2) TMI 927 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=392483</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal for statistical purposes, emphasizing the need for a thorough re-examination by the AO in light of additional evidence. The judgment highlighted the importance of considering the business purpose behind advances from subsidiaries in determining tax treatment under the Income Tax Act.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 22 Jan 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=392483</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>