<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (2) TMI 922 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=392478</link>
    <description>The ITAT upheld the addition on account of creditors due to lack of evidence establishing the creditor&#039;s existence and transaction genuineness. The appellant&#039;s arguments regarding the creditor&#039;s location and computer-generated bills were not deemed sufficient. Additionally, the ITAT upheld the disallowance of expenses as the appellant failed to provide supporting details and adequate explanations, ultimately dismissing the appeal for lack of sufficient evidence and documentation to support expense claims.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 31 Dec 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 21 Feb 2020 12:05:18 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=604686" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (2) TMI 922 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=392478</link>
      <description>The ITAT upheld the addition on account of creditors due to lack of evidence establishing the creditor&#039;s existence and transaction genuineness. The appellant&#039;s arguments regarding the creditor&#039;s location and computer-generated bills were not deemed sufficient. Additionally, the ITAT upheld the disallowance of expenses as the appellant failed to provide supporting details and adequate explanations, ultimately dismissing the appeal for lack of sufficient evidence and documentation to support expense claims.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 31 Dec 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=392478</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>