<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (2) TMI 908 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=392464</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the denial of a refund of un-utilized Cenvat Credit under Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004, finding that the appellant&#039;s subsequent reversal of the refund amount in their GSTR-3B Return for October 2018 complied with relevant regulations. The denial was deemed unjustified as there was no provision to debit the refund amount in the GST regime, and the Tribunal granted the appeal, providing consequential benefits as per law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 20 Feb 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 21 Feb 2020 11:07:04 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=604667" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (2) TMI 908 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=392464</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the denial of a refund of un-utilized Cenvat Credit under Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004, finding that the appellant&#039;s subsequent reversal of the refund amount in their GSTR-3B Return for October 2018 complied with relevant regulations. The denial was deemed unjustified as there was no provision to debit the refund amount in the GST regime, and the Tribunal granted the appeal, providing consequential benefits as per law.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 20 Feb 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=392464</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>