<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Managing Director Penalized for Duty Evasion; Rule 26 Penalty Deemed Harsh, Reduced to Fair Amount.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=51919</link>
    <description>Levy of personal penalty on the Manager Director of the company - there are no merits in submissions that penalty under Rule 26 could not have been imposed upon the appellant, however, the penalty equivalent to the duty evaded on by P.M.L industries on the appellant is too harsh and should be reduced. - AT</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 21 Feb 2020 10:43:53 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 21 Feb 2020 10:43:53 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=604663" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Managing Director Penalized for Duty Evasion; Rule 26 Penalty Deemed Harsh, Reduced to Fair Amount.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=51919</link>
      <description>Levy of personal penalty on the Manager Director of the company - there are no merits in submissions that penalty under Rule 26 could not have been imposed upon the appellant, however, the penalty equivalent to the duty evaded on by P.M.L industries on the appellant is too harsh and should be reduced. - AT</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 21 Feb 2020 10:43:53 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=51919</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>