<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (2) TMI 902 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=392458</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that the DTA unit was required to reverse the CENVAT Credit on cleared inputs to the 100% EOU unit when the final product became exempted, in accordance with Rule 11(3). Additionally, the 100% EOU unit was entitled to a refund of accumulated CENVAT Credit on export of finished goods under Rule 5. The Tribunal allowed both appeals, clarifying the obligations of the DTA unit and confirming the admissibility of the cash refund claim by the EOU unit.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 18 Dec 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 21 Feb 2020 10:37:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=604658" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (2) TMI 902 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=392458</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that the DTA unit was required to reverse the CENVAT Credit on cleared inputs to the 100% EOU unit when the final product became exempted, in accordance with Rule 11(3). Additionally, the 100% EOU unit was entitled to a refund of accumulated CENVAT Credit on export of finished goods under Rule 5. The Tribunal allowed both appeals, clarifying the obligations of the DTA unit and confirming the admissibility of the cash refund claim by the EOU unit.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 18 Dec 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=392458</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>