<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>High Court Rules Intent to Evade Tax Must Be Proven for Penalty Under UP VAT Act Section 54(1)(14.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=51915</link>
    <description>Levy of penalty u/s 54(1)(14) of the UP VAT Act, 2008 - Unfilled (blank) column No.8 of Form 38 - The Tribunal has not correctly applied the law in this regard, as they have not given any finding about the intention to evade tax, which is a precondition for imposition of penalty. - HC</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 21 Feb 2020 10:26:24 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 21 Feb 2020 10:26:24 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=604655" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>High Court Rules Intent to Evade Tax Must Be Proven for Penalty Under UP VAT Act Section 54(1)(14.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=51915</link>
      <description>Levy of penalty u/s 54(1)(14) of the UP VAT Act, 2008 - Unfilled (blank) column No.8 of Form 38 - The Tribunal has not correctly applied the law in this regard, as they have not given any finding about the intention to evade tax, which is a precondition for imposition of penalty. - HC</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 21 Feb 2020 10:26:24 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=51915</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>