https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=286336 A jurisdictional objection was raised to proceedings before respondent no. 3, questioning whether that authority could lawfully proceed. The Delhi High Court allowed the proceedings to continue for the time being, but required respondent no. 3 to consider the petitioner's submissions and decide the jurisdictional objection first by a reasoned order before moving to the merits. No final determination on jurisdiction was made in the document, and further action on the merits was made conditional on that preliminary decision. en-us Mon, 09 Dec 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 13 Mar 2025 15:52:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=286336 A jurisdictional objection was raised to proceedings before respondent no. 3, questioning whether that authority could lawfully proceed. The Delhi High Court allowed the proceedings to continue for the time being, but required respondent no. 3 to consider the petitioner's submissions and decide the jurisdictional objection first by a reasoned order before moving to the merits. No final determination on jurisdiction was made in the document, and further action on the merits was made conditional on that preliminary decision. Case-Laws GST Mon, 09 Dec 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=286336