<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (2) TMI 888 - ITAT CUTTACK</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=392444</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, canceling the penalty imposed under section 271BA of the Income Tax Act. The penalty was deemed unsustainable due to the omission of clause (i) of Section 92BA by the Finance Act, 2017, indicating that actions taken under the omitted provision are invalid. The judgment emphasized that penalties imposed under such provisions are not legally enforceable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 17 Feb 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 20 Feb 2020 12:41:05 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=604602" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (2) TMI 888 - ITAT CUTTACK</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=392444</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, canceling the penalty imposed under section 271BA of the Income Tax Act. The penalty was deemed unsustainable due to the omission of clause (i) of Section 92BA by the Finance Act, 2017, indicating that actions taken under the omitted provision are invalid. The judgment emphasized that penalties imposed under such provisions are not legally enforceable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 17 Feb 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=392444</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>