<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (2) TMI 887 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=392443</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed all appeals, concluding that the AMP expenditure by the assessee did not qualify as an international transaction. It upheld the economic adjustment allowed by the Commissioner (Appeals) for AMP expenditure. Additionally, the Revenue&#039;s appeal for the assessment year 2007-08 was dismissed due to the tax effect being below the monetary limit set by CBDT Circular no.17/2019.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 14 Feb 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 07 Nov 2024 11:31:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=604600" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (2) TMI 887 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=392443</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed all appeals, concluding that the AMP expenditure by the assessee did not qualify as an international transaction. It upheld the economic adjustment allowed by the Commissioner (Appeals) for AMP expenditure. Additionally, the Revenue&#039;s appeal for the assessment year 2007-08 was dismissed due to the tax effect being below the monetary limit set by CBDT Circular no.17/2019.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 14 Feb 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=392443</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>