<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (2) TMI 879 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=392435</link>
    <description>The tribunal allowed the appeal, deleting the additions made under Section 56(2)(vii) of the Income-tax Act. It emphasized the importance of considering ground realities and legislative intent in applying deeming provisions, concluding that the additions were not sustainable. The tribunal noted the reduced guideline value by the State Government and the amendment to minimize hardships in real estate transactions, leading to the decision to delete the additions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 10 Feb 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 20 Feb 2020 12:16:25 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=604588" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (2) TMI 879 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=392435</link>
      <description>The tribunal allowed the appeal, deleting the additions made under Section 56(2)(vii) of the Income-tax Act. It emphasized the importance of considering ground realities and legislative intent in applying deeming provisions, concluding that the additions were not sustainable. The tribunal noted the reduced guideline value by the State Government and the amendment to minimize hardships in real estate transactions, leading to the decision to delete the additions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 10 Feb 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=392435</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>