https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=392433 The court dismissed the appeal, upholding the decision that the writ petition challenging the provisional attachment under the Prohibition of Benami Property Transactions Act, 1988, was premature. The court emphasized that the appellants could raise their contentions before the adjudicating authority and clarified that the provisional attachment orders were interim measures pending final adjudication. en-us Thu, 06 Feb 2020 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 20 Feb 2020 11:38:41 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=392433 The court dismissed the appeal, upholding the decision that the writ petition challenging the provisional attachment under the Prohibition of Benami Property Transactions Act, 1988, was premature. The court emphasized that the appellants could raise their contentions before the adjudicating authority and clarified that the provisional attachment orders were interim measures pending final adjudication. Case-Laws Benami Property Thu, 06 Feb 2020 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=392433