<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (2) TMI 869 - SECURITIES APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=392425</link>
    <description>The tribunal quashed the part of the order restraining the appellant from accepting new clients but allowed other directions by SEBI&#039;s Whole Time Member to remain. The tribunal emphasized that SEBI should issue ex parte ad interim orders sparingly and only in urgent situations, finding the order in this case to violate principles of natural justice. The appeal was partly allowed, with no costs imposed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 26 Nov 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 20 Feb 2020 11:26:15 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=604566" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (2) TMI 869 - SECURITIES APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=392425</link>
      <description>The tribunal quashed the part of the order restraining the appellant from accepting new clients but allowed other directions by SEBI&#039;s Whole Time Member to remain. The tribunal emphasized that SEBI should issue ex parte ad interim orders sparingly and only in urgent situations, finding the order in this case to violate principles of natural justice. The appeal was partly allowed, with no costs imposed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>SEBI</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 26 Nov 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=392425</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>