https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=392422 The Tribunal dismissed the appellant's applications to revisit the order dated 17.10.2019 and to grant possession of the ground floor of the attached property. The Tribunal found inconsistencies in the appellant's arguments and rejected the plea for possession, noting the rental arrangement of the property. Additionally, the application for a stay on the letter dated 14.01.2020 was dismissed, with the Tribunal emphasizing that the corrigendum did not significantly impact the appellant's rights. Further proceedings were scheduled for a specified date. en-us Wed, 19 Feb 2020 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 20 Feb 2020 11:13:18 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=392422 The Tribunal dismissed the appellant's applications to revisit the order dated 17.10.2019 and to grant possession of the ground floor of the attached property. The Tribunal found inconsistencies in the appellant's arguments and rejected the plea for possession, noting the rental arrangement of the property. Additionally, the application for a stay on the letter dated 14.01.2020 was dismissed, with the Tribunal emphasizing that the corrigendum did not significantly impact the appellant's rights. Further proceedings were scheduled for a specified date. Case-Laws Money Laundering Wed, 19 Feb 2020 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=392422