<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (2) TMI 863 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=392419</link>
    <description>Appeals in a central excise matter were withdrawn after the respondent pointed out that the tax effect was below the monetary limit prescribed by the notification dated 22.08.2019. The Court allowed the application for withdrawal and dismissed the civil appeals as withdrawn. The order reflects application of the tax-effect threshold for pursuing departmental appeals, with the financial implication stated to be below the prescribed limit.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 17 Feb 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 20 Feb 2020 11:10:09 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=604559" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (2) TMI 863 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=392419</link>
      <description>Appeals in a central excise matter were withdrawn after the respondent pointed out that the tax effect was below the monetary limit prescribed by the notification dated 22.08.2019. The Court allowed the application for withdrawal and dismissed the civil appeals as withdrawn. The order reflects application of the tax-effect threshold for pursuing departmental appeals, with the financial implication stated to be below the prescribed limit.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 17 Feb 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=392419</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>