<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (4) TMI 1029 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=286312</link>
    <description>The court allowed the plaintiff&#039;s application for condonation of delay under Section 5 of the Limitation Act, despite opposition from the defendants. The court emphasized the need to advance substantial justice and noted that the power to condone delay can be exercised if sufficient cause is shown. The plaintiff was directed to pay costs and the legal representatives of the deceased defendant were brought on record for further proceedings.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 09 Apr 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 20 Feb 2020 10:37:33 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=604553" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (4) TMI 1029 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=286312</link>
      <description>The court allowed the plaintiff&#039;s application for condonation of delay under Section 5 of the Limitation Act, despite opposition from the defendants. The court emphasized the need to advance substantial justice and noted that the power to condone delay can be exercised if sufficient cause is shown. The plaintiff was directed to pay costs and the legal representatives of the deceased defendant were brought on record for further proceedings.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 09 Apr 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=286312</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>