<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (11) TMI 1380 - SECURITIES APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=286308</link>
    <description>The tribunal allowed the appeal of Adi Cooper, setting aside the order of debarment against him due to lack of evidence of his involvement in the fraudulent scheme post his resignation. However, the appeal of Kishore Hegde was dismissed, upholding the order of debarment against him for his involvement in the fraudulent GDR arrangement, which was found to violate SEBI laws and regulations.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 05 Nov 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 20 Feb 2020 10:22:24 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=604545" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (11) TMI 1380 - SECURITIES APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=286308</link>
      <description>The tribunal allowed the appeal of Adi Cooper, setting aside the order of debarment against him due to lack of evidence of his involvement in the fraudulent scheme post his resignation. However, the appeal of Kishore Hegde was dismissed, upholding the order of debarment against him for his involvement in the fraudulent GDR arrangement, which was found to violate SEBI laws and regulations.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>SEBI</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 05 Nov 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=286308</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>