<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1959 (1) TMI 35 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=286305</link>
    <description>In a suit for accounts, appellate jurisdiction is governed by the valuation stated in the plaint unless the court has made a precise statutory determination and the plaint is formally amended; a party&#039;s conduct cannot confer jurisdiction contrary to statute, and there is no estoppel against statute. On limitation, section 5 of the Indian Limitation Act permits judicial discretion to extend time where the delay is explained on the record, and a separate formal application is not indispensable if the material already shows sufficient cause. Applying these principles, the lower appellate court&#039;s dismissal was set aside, the appeal was allowed, and the matter was remanded for disposal according to law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 1959 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 20 Feb 2020 10:19:47 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=604530" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1959 (1) TMI 35 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=286305</link>
      <description>In a suit for accounts, appellate jurisdiction is governed by the valuation stated in the plaint unless the court has made a precise statutory determination and the plaint is formally amended; a party&#039;s conduct cannot confer jurisdiction contrary to statute, and there is no estoppel against statute. On limitation, section 5 of the Indian Limitation Act permits judicial discretion to extend time where the delay is explained on the record, and a separate formal application is not indispensable if the material already shows sufficient cause. Applying these principles, the lower appellate court&#039;s dismissal was set aside, the appeal was allowed, and the matter was remanded for disposal according to law.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 1959 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=286305</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>