https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=392414 The appeals were accepted, and the orders passed by the Assistant Commissioner were set aside. A nominal penalty of Rs. 1,000/- was imposed under Section 125 of the CGST/HPGST Act, 2017, for minor procedural lapses. The initial tax and penalty imposed were considered harsh and unsustainable. The judgment highlighted the importance of providing a reasonable opportunity to update E-way bills and the absence of intent to evade tax. en-us Tue, 11 Feb 2020 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 17 Mar 2025 11:09:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=392414 The appeals were accepted, and the orders passed by the Assistant Commissioner were set aside. A nominal penalty of Rs. 1,000/- was imposed under Section 125 of the CGST/HPGST Act, 2017, for minor procedural lapses. The initial tax and penalty imposed were considered harsh and unsustainable. The judgment highlighted the importance of providing a reasonable opportunity to update E-way bills and the absence of intent to evade tax. Case-Laws GST Tue, 11 Feb 2020 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=392414