<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1954 (3) TMI 85 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=286289</link>
    <description>The court held that the taxing department was justified in levying tax at the maximum rate as the shares of the beneficiaries in the trust were deemed indeterminate and unknown. This decision affirmed the Tribunal&#039;s ruling on the trustees&#039; obligation to pay tax at the maximum rate under the first proviso to Section 41(1) of the Income-tax Act.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 19 Mar 1954 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Feb 2020 17:15:33 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=604513" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1954 (3) TMI 85 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=286289</link>
      <description>The court held that the taxing department was justified in levying tax at the maximum rate as the shares of the beneficiaries in the trust were deemed indeterminate and unknown. This decision affirmed the Tribunal&#039;s ruling on the trustees&#039; obligation to pay tax at the maximum rate under the first proviso to Section 41(1) of the Income-tax Act.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 19 Mar 1954 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=286289</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>