<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (2) TMI 852 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=392408</link>
    <description>The court upheld the validity of Notification No. EST/1/Jurisdiction/B.2168 dated 05.07.2017, allowing delegation of the Commissioner&#039;s powers under the Gujarat Goods and Services Tax Act. It was held that the delegation was authorized under the Act, necessary due to administrative complexities. The court affirmed that the &quot;reasonable belief&quot; for arrest under Section 69 could be formed by the delegate. The delegation was found compliant with statutory and constitutional provisions, ensuring effective administration of the GGST Act. Writ applications challenging the notification were rejected, and the rule was discharged.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 04 Feb 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 17 Mar 2025 11:24:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=604506" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (2) TMI 852 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=392408</link>
      <description>The court upheld the validity of Notification No. EST/1/Jurisdiction/B.2168 dated 05.07.2017, allowing delegation of the Commissioner&#039;s powers under the Gujarat Goods and Services Tax Act. It was held that the delegation was authorized under the Act, necessary due to administrative complexities. The court affirmed that the &quot;reasonable belief&quot; for arrest under Section 69 could be formed by the delegate. The delegation was found compliant with statutory and constitutional provisions, ensuring effective administration of the GGST Act. Writ applications challenging the notification were rejected, and the rule was discharged.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 04 Feb 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=392408</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>