<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1992 (4) TMI 31 - ORISSA High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=21450</link>
    <description>The High Court of Orissa considered the case of directors of a company claiming remuneration as &quot;salaries&quot; and seeking standard deduction under section 16(i) of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The Court found that the assessees did not prove the necessary relationship of employee and employer, concluding they were not entitled to the deduction under section 16(i) of the Act. Justice D. P. Mohapatra concurred with the decision.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 22 Apr 1992 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 15:23:32 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=60449" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1992 (4) TMI 31 - ORISSA High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=21450</link>
      <description>The High Court of Orissa considered the case of directors of a company claiming remuneration as &quot;salaries&quot; and seeking standard deduction under section 16(i) of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The Court found that the assessees did not prove the necessary relationship of employee and employer, concluding they were not entitled to the deduction under section 16(i) of the Act. Justice D. P. Mohapatra concurred with the decision.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 22 Apr 1992 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=21450</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>