<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (2) TMI 828 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=392384</link>
    <description>The ITAT set aside the Ld. CIT(A)&#039;s dismissal of the appeal due to a delay in electronic filing, emphasizing substantial justice over procedural technicalities. Referring to legal precedents, the ITAT directed the Ld. CIT(A) to hear the appeal on merits after condoning the delay, highlighting that procedural laws should not hinder justice.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 29 Jan 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Feb 2020 13:26:06 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=604456" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (2) TMI 828 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=392384</link>
      <description>The ITAT set aside the Ld. CIT(A)&#039;s dismissal of the appeal due to a delay in electronic filing, emphasizing substantial justice over procedural technicalities. Referring to legal precedents, the ITAT directed the Ld. CIT(A) to hear the appeal on merits after condoning the delay, highlighting that procedural laws should not hinder justice.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 29 Jan 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=392384</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>