<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (2) TMI 824 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=392380</link>
    <description>The ITAT ruled in favor of the appellant, an auto parts manufacturer in liquidation, by directing the deletion of the penalty imposed under section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The tribunal found that the foreign exchange loss claim, initially disallowed, was a bona fide error without intent to evade tax. Citing precedents from the SC, the ITAT concluded that the penalty was unjustified, thereby allowing the appeal and revoking the penalty of Rs. 6,54,85,242/-.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 04 Dec 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 07 Nov 2024 11:39:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=604450" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (2) TMI 824 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=392380</link>
      <description>The ITAT ruled in favor of the appellant, an auto parts manufacturer in liquidation, by directing the deletion of the penalty imposed under section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The tribunal found that the foreign exchange loss claim, initially disallowed, was a bona fide error without intent to evade tax. Citing precedents from the SC, the ITAT concluded that the penalty was unjustified, thereby allowing the appeal and revoking the penalty of Rs. 6,54,85,242/-.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 04 Dec 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=392380</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>