<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (2) TMI 820 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=392376</link>
    <description>A notice-stage order under Section 45 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, directing the jurisdiction and arbitrability questions to be heard first, was treated as not ordinarily warranting appellate interference. The existing interim arrangement in the connected company-petition proceedings was ordered to continue during pendency of the petition under Sections 241-242 of the Companies Act, 2013. The request for investigation into company ownership was not decided in these appeals; although Section 216 of the Companies Act, 2013 was noted, the issue was left for consideration at the appropriate stage in the pending interlocutory applications before the Tribunal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 17 Feb 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Feb 2020 13:16:02 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=604445" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (2) TMI 820 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=392376</link>
      <description>A notice-stage order under Section 45 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, directing the jurisdiction and arbitrability questions to be heard first, was treated as not ordinarily warranting appellate interference. The existing interim arrangement in the connected company-petition proceedings was ordered to continue during pendency of the petition under Sections 241-242 of the Companies Act, 2013. The request for investigation into company ownership was not decided in these appeals; although Section 216 of the Companies Act, 2013 was noted, the issue was left for consideration at the appropriate stage in the pending interlocutory applications before the Tribunal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 17 Feb 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=392376</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>