<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (2) TMI 815 - GAUHATI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=392371</link>
    <description>The court found the CESTAT&#039;s order unsustainable, setting it aside and interfering with the Show Cause notice. The appellant was permitted to issue a new Show Cause notice with specific details and exclusions, allowing the respondent procedural safeguards. The order from 2008 was deemed ineffective, and the appeal was disposed of accordingly.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 12 Feb 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 29 Oct 2020 13:40:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=604431" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (2) TMI 815 - GAUHATI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=392371</link>
      <description>The court found the CESTAT&#039;s order unsustainable, setting it aside and interfering with the Show Cause notice. The appellant was permitted to issue a new Show Cause notice with specific details and exclusions, allowing the respondent procedural safeguards. The order from 2008 was deemed ineffective, and the appeal was disposed of accordingly.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 12 Feb 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=392371</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>