<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Extended Limitation Period Invoked in Service Classification Dispute; No Fraud Alleged, No Demand Made by High Court.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=51872</link>
    <description>Invocation of Extended period of Limitation - presence of two views as whether the service provided by the respondent is Management or Business Consultancy or not - It is not the case of the appellant (revenue) that there was either fraud perpetrated by the respondent or there has been any collusion or willful mis-statement of facts before the revenue. - No demand - HC</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 19 Feb 2020 10:36:19 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Feb 2020 10:36:19 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=604426" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Extended Limitation Period Invoked in Service Classification Dispute; No Fraud Alleged, No Demand Made by High Court.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=51872</link>
      <description>Invocation of Extended period of Limitation - presence of two views as whether the service provided by the respondent is Management or Business Consultancy or not - It is not the case of the appellant (revenue) that there was either fraud perpetrated by the respondent or there has been any collusion or willful mis-statement of facts before the revenue. - No demand - HC</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 19 Feb 2020 10:36:19 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=51872</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>