<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (2) TMI 804 - TELANGANA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=392360</link>
    <description>In corruption investigations against a public servant, the absence of a preliminary enquiry before registration of the FIR may weigh against the validity of the case, especially where the police proceed only on source information without verifying disclosed income, returns, declarations, and related records. The article also notes that an FIR alleging disproportionate assets must disclose reliable prima facie material; material arithmetical and valuation errors, such as overstated assets, understated income, and duplicate inclusion of the same property item, can undermine the foundation of the prosecution. On that reasoning, continuation of the proceedings was treated as an abuse of process and consequential relief followed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 11 Feb 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Feb 2020 10:01:06 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=604413" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (2) TMI 804 - TELANGANA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=392360</link>
      <description>In corruption investigations against a public servant, the absence of a preliminary enquiry before registration of the FIR may weigh against the validity of the case, especially where the police proceed only on source information without verifying disclosed income, returns, declarations, and related records. The article also notes that an FIR alleging disproportionate assets must disclose reliable prima facie material; material arithmetical and valuation errors, such as overstated assets, understated income, and duplicate inclusion of the same property item, can undermine the foundation of the prosecution. On that reasoning, continuation of the proceedings was treated as an abuse of process and consequential relief followed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 11 Feb 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=392360</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>