<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (2) TMI 800 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=392356</link>
    <description>A writ petition was withdrawn after counsel stated that relevant facts had been inadvertently omitted, including earlier writ petitions on similar facts. The petitioner was permitted to withdraw the petition with liberty to pursue the pending writ petition, and with a statement that no fresh petition would be filed on the same cause of action. The petition was accordingly dismissed as withdrawn with that liberty.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sat, 18 Jan 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Feb 2020 09:51:22 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=604405" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (2) TMI 800 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=392356</link>
      <description>A writ petition was withdrawn after counsel stated that relevant facts had been inadvertently omitted, including earlier writ petitions on similar facts. The petitioner was permitted to withdraw the petition with liberty to pursue the pending writ petition, and with a statement that no fresh petition would be filed on the same cause of action. The petition was accordingly dismissed as withdrawn with that liberty.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Sat, 18 Jan 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=392356</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>