https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=286279 A demonstrable arithmetical error in the tax demand could be corrected in revision, and the demand on brick purchases was reduced accordingly. However, a factual objection concerning assessment of different articles was not open at the revisional stage because it had not been raised before the appellate authorities. The demand was therefore corrected from Rs. 4,78,250/- to Rs. 47,825/- on brick purchases of Rs. 9,56,000/-, and the revisions were disposed of to that extent, with the remaining challenge left undisturbed by the HC. en-us Tue, 07 May 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 19 Feb 2020 09:50:53 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=286279 A demonstrable arithmetical error in the tax demand could be corrected in revision, and the demand on brick purchases was reduced accordingly. However, a factual objection concerning assessment of different articles was not open at the revisional stage because it had not been raised before the appellate authorities. The demand was therefore corrected from Rs. 4,78,250/- to Rs. 47,825/- on brick purchases of Rs. 9,56,000/-, and the revisions were disposed of to that extent, with the remaining challenge left undisturbed by the HC. Case-Laws VAT and Sales Tax Tue, 07 May 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=286279