<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1991 (10) TMI 21 - BOMBAY High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=21440</link>
    <description>The court allowed the petition, quashing the orders of attachment and ruling that assessment orders made through one legal representative cannot bind other legal heirs or their properties. The judgment emphasized the importance of proper notice to all legal representatives for a valid assessment and highlighted limitations on reassessment to prevent legal ambiguity.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 28 Oct 1991 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 13:33:48 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=60439" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1991 (10) TMI 21 - BOMBAY High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=21440</link>
      <description>The court allowed the petition, quashing the orders of attachment and ruling that assessment orders made through one legal representative cannot bind other legal heirs or their properties. The judgment emphasized the importance of proper notice to all legal representatives for a valid assessment and highlighted limitations on reassessment to prevent legal ambiguity.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 28 Oct 1991 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=21440</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>