https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=286263 A claim for damages for breach of contract was not barred by res judicata because the earlier proceedings had not finally and conclusively determined the factual matters now relied on in the same sense. The suit was also held within time because the plaintiffs had bona fide prosecuted related proceedings that kept the claim effectively alive until the underlying awards were set aside and repayment was ordered; alternatively, the appellate judgment gave rise to a fresh enforceable cause of action. Damages were recoverable, and decree was passed with costs and interest. en-us Fri, 24 Aug 1928 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 18 Feb 2020 18:25:01 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=286263 A claim for damages for breach of contract was not barred by res judicata because the earlier proceedings had not finally and conclusively determined the factual matters now relied on in the same sense. The suit was also held within time because the plaintiffs had bona fide prosecuted related proceedings that kept the claim effectively alive until the underlying awards were set aside and repayment was ordered; alternatively, the appellate judgment gave rise to a fresh enforceable cause of action. Damages were recoverable, and decree was passed with costs and interest. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 24 Aug 1928 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=286263