<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1987 (2) TMI 529 - MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=286261</link>
    <description>The Madhya Pradesh High Court notes that where a municipal statute expressly permits delegation of any power conferred on the Commissioner, the delegation may extend to quasi-judicial functions unless the enactment clearly restricts it. The power to decide objections to valuation under Section 148 was treated as quasi-judicial, yet the presence of supervision and control did not invalidate delegation. The delegated officer&#039;s determination was regarded as an order of the Commissioner and was separately appealable. In the absence of any material showing bias or lack of jurisdiction, the delegated valuation orders were upheld and the challenge to them failed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 04 Feb 1987 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 18 Feb 2020 14:56:47 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=604367" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1987 (2) TMI 529 - MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=286261</link>
      <description>The Madhya Pradesh High Court notes that where a municipal statute expressly permits delegation of any power conferred on the Commissioner, the delegation may extend to quasi-judicial functions unless the enactment clearly restricts it. The power to decide objections to valuation under Section 148 was treated as quasi-judicial, yet the presence of supervision and control did not invalidate delegation. The delegated officer&#039;s determination was regarded as an order of the Commissioner and was separately appealable. In the absence of any material showing bias or lack of jurisdiction, the delegated valuation orders were upheld and the challenge to them failed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 04 Feb 1987 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=286261</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>