<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (2) TMI 795 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=392351</link>
    <description>The court directed the respondent to permit the petitioner to upload Tran-1 for transition of credit, recognizing the challenges faced by taxpayers in adapting to the GST system. Previous judgments emphasized that time limits for transition of credit are not strictly mandatory, and transition of credit was deemed a constitutional right. The court exercised discretion in allowing the petitioner to claim transitional credit, highlighting the distinction between credit availing and utilization falling under assessment.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 21 Jan 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 17 Mar 2025 12:46:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=604359" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (2) TMI 795 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=392351</link>
      <description>The court directed the respondent to permit the petitioner to upload Tran-1 for transition of credit, recognizing the challenges faced by taxpayers in adapting to the GST system. Previous judgments emphasized that time limits for transition of credit are not strictly mandatory, and transition of credit was deemed a constitutional right. The court exercised discretion in allowing the petitioner to claim transitional credit, highlighting the distinction between credit availing and utilization falling under assessment.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 21 Jan 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=392351</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>