<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>High Court Clarifies Timely Payment Obligations for Employee Contributions Under Income Tax Act Sections 36(1)(va) and 2(24)(x.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=51861</link>
    <description>Late payment of employee&#039;s contribution towards PF, ESIC - additions by invoking provisions of Section 36(1)(va) read with Section 2(24)(x) - Finding recorded by the Tribunal that if such wages are paid for the following month, the liability to deposit the employee&#039;s contribution to the fund gets deferred by another month is not the correct statement of law. - HC</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 18 Feb 2020 13:15:18 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 18 Feb 2020 13:15:18 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=604354" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>High Court Clarifies Timely Payment Obligations for Employee Contributions Under Income Tax Act Sections 36(1)(va) and 2(24)(x.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=51861</link>
      <description>Late payment of employee&#039;s contribution towards PF, ESIC - additions by invoking provisions of Section 36(1)(va) read with Section 2(24)(x) - Finding recorded by the Tribunal that if such wages are paid for the following month, the liability to deposit the employee&#039;s contribution to the fund gets deferred by another month is not the correct statement of law. - HC</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 18 Feb 2020 13:15:18 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=51861</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>