https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=392346 ITAT, Bangalore held the reference to the DVO under s.142A invalid because books were not rejected, relying on SC precedent; therefore additions based solely on the DVO report cannot be sustained. However, the tribunal found the assessee's challenge to unvouched expenditure and unsupported contentions general and inadmissible, and upheld the addition affirmed by CIT(A). Decision rendered against the assessee. en-us Wed, 12 Feb 2020 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 22 Aug 2025 22:26:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=392346 ITAT, Bangalore held the reference to the DVO under s.142A invalid because books were not rejected, relying on SC precedent; therefore additions based solely on the DVO report cannot be sustained. However, the tribunal found the assessee's challenge to unvouched expenditure and unsupported contentions general and inadmissible, and upheld the addition affirmed by CIT(A). Decision rendered against the assessee. Case-Laws Income Tax Wed, 12 Feb 2020 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=392346