<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (2) TMI 785 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=392341</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, treating the mesne profit as a capital receipt, directing verification for the disallowance of professional fees, deleting the addition for the discrepancy in interest income, and classifying the interest income on fixed deposits as business income. The appeal was allowed for statistical purposes.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 07 Feb 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 18 Feb 2020 12:56:45 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=604343" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (2) TMI 785 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=392341</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, treating the mesne profit as a capital receipt, directing verification for the disallowance of professional fees, deleting the addition for the discrepancy in interest income, and classifying the interest income on fixed deposits as business income. The appeal was allowed for statistical purposes.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 07 Feb 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=392341</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>