<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (2) TMI 784 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=392340</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal of the assessee, setting aside the penalty under section 271(1)(c) as the additional income was voluntarily disclosed without specific query or incriminating documents found during the search, distinguishing it from cases where such evidence was present.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 06 Feb 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 18 Feb 2020 12:55:06 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=604341" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (2) TMI 784 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=392340</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal of the assessee, setting aside the penalty under section 271(1)(c) as the additional income was voluntarily disclosed without specific query or incriminating documents found during the search, distinguishing it from cases where such evidence was present.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 06 Feb 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=392340</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>