<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (2) TMI 783 - ITAT AMRITSAR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=392339</link>
    <description>The tribunal quashed the penalty of Rs. 74,310 imposed under section 271(1)(c) due to the AO&#039;s failure to specify the charge in the &#039;Show Cause&#039; notice, thereby violating the mandate of section 274(1). The appeal of the assessee was allowed, and the penalty was set aside. The tribunal refrained from addressing the merits of the case as the penalty was quashed for lack of jurisdiction.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 06 Feb 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 18 Feb 2020 12:53:11 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=604340" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (2) TMI 783 - ITAT AMRITSAR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=392339</link>
      <description>The tribunal quashed the penalty of Rs. 74,310 imposed under section 271(1)(c) due to the AO&#039;s failure to specify the charge in the &#039;Show Cause&#039; notice, thereby violating the mandate of section 274(1). The appeal of the assessee was allowed, and the penalty was set aside. The tribunal refrained from addressing the merits of the case as the penalty was quashed for lack of jurisdiction.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 06 Feb 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=392339</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>