https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=392323 The Court dismissed the challenge to the order confiscating smuggled betel nuts under the Customs Act, 1962. The petitioners' request for relief through a Writ Petition under Article 226 was rejected, emphasizing the availability of an alternate statutory remedy under Section 128 of the Customs Act for appeal. The Court found that all disputed factual issues were addressed in the order and that the appellate authority had broader jurisdiction to reassess evidence. Petitioners were advised to pursue remedies through the appropriate legal procedures, highlighting the importance of adhering to statutory remedies over Writ Petitions in challenging administrative orders under the Customs Act. en-us Tue, 21 Jan 2020 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 18 Feb 2020 11:54:03 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=392323 The Court dismissed the challenge to the order confiscating smuggled betel nuts under the Customs Act, 1962. The petitioners' request for relief through a Writ Petition under Article 226 was rejected, emphasizing the availability of an alternate statutory remedy under Section 128 of the Customs Act for appeal. The Court found that all disputed factual issues were addressed in the order and that the appellate authority had broader jurisdiction to reassess evidence. Petitioners were advised to pursue remedies through the appropriate legal procedures, highlighting the importance of adhering to statutory remedies over Writ Petitions in challenging administrative orders under the Customs Act. Case-Laws Customs Tue, 21 Jan 2020 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=392323