<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (2) TMI 758 - CESTAT ALLAHABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=392314</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the impugned order rejecting refund claims filed by a branch office where service tax was paid by the head office, citing jurisdictional issues. Emphasizing the importance of jurisdictional clarity, the Tribunal remanded the matter for appropriate action based on earlier precedent, directing transfer to the relevant authority for adjudication.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 04 Feb 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 18 Feb 2020 11:25:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=604301" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (2) TMI 758 - CESTAT ALLAHABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=392314</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the impugned order rejecting refund claims filed by a branch office where service tax was paid by the head office, citing jurisdictional issues. Emphasizing the importance of jurisdictional clarity, the Tribunal remanded the matter for appropriate action based on earlier precedent, directing transfer to the relevant authority for adjudication.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 04 Feb 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=392314</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>