https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=286256 Recruitment to the Munsiff cadre was governed by statutory rules under Article 234 and the proviso to Article 309, with separate procedures for direct recruitment and promotion. For promotion, the Commission had to assess suitability on merit by considering service record and prescribed factors. The Court held that the High Court could not uphold the existing selection list and at the same time direct insertion of the six petitioners merely because they had approached the Court; it could either quash an unlawful selection or leave it undisturbed. The promotion list was not shown to have been based on the later viva voce test, and participation of some candidates in both processes, or the alleged change in the examining body, did not by itself vitiate the promotion selection. The direction to include the petitioners was therefore set aside. en-us Fri, 31 Jul 1964 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 18 Feb 2020 11:01:23 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=286256 Recruitment to the Munsiff cadre was governed by statutory rules under Article 234 and the proviso to Article 309, with separate procedures for direct recruitment and promotion. For promotion, the Commission had to assess suitability on merit by considering service record and prescribed factors. The Court held that the High Court could not uphold the existing selection list and at the same time direct insertion of the six petitioners merely because they had approached the Court; it could either quash an unlawful selection or leave it undisturbed. The promotion list was not shown to have been based on the later viva voce test, and participation of some candidates in both processes, or the alleged change in the examining body, did not by itself vitiate the promotion selection. The direction to include the petitioners was therefore set aside. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 31 Jul 1964 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=286256