https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=392300 In a Section 138 prosecution, the accused must ordinarily raise disputed defences before the trial court under the special summary procedure in the Negotiable Instruments Act, including the statutory presumptions and the mechanism for recall of witnesses under Section 145(2). Inherent jurisdiction under Section 482 CrPC cannot be used to quash a summoning order or short-circuit the trial where the defence is factual and requires evidence. The challenge to the summoning order was therefore rejected, and quashing was held not maintainable on the facts shown. en-us Wed, 05 Feb 2020 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 18 Feb 2020 08:32:04 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=392300 In a Section 138 prosecution, the accused must ordinarily raise disputed defences before the trial court under the special summary procedure in the Negotiable Instruments Act, including the statutory presumptions and the mechanism for recall of witnesses under Section 145(2). Inherent jurisdiction under Section 482 CrPC cannot be used to quash a summoning order or short-circuit the trial where the defence is factual and requires evidence. The challenge to the summoning order was therefore rejected, and quashing was held not maintainable on the facts shown. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 05 Feb 2020 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=392300