<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (4) TMI 1828 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=286242</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the order demanding payment under Rule 6(3) of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004. It held that goods enjoying value-based exemption under Notification No. 8/2003-CE were not considered exempted goods under Rule 2(d) of the Cenvat Credit Rules. The Commissioner&#039;s interpretation was deemed incorrect, and the original order was restored, providing consequential relief to the appellants.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 02 Apr 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 18 Feb 2020 08:28:55 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=604256" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (4) TMI 1828 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=286242</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the order demanding payment under Rule 6(3) of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004. It held that goods enjoying value-based exemption under Notification No. 8/2003-CE were not considered exempted goods under Rule 2(d) of the Cenvat Credit Rules. The Commissioner&#039;s interpretation was deemed incorrect, and the original order was restored, providing consequential relief to the appellants.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 02 Apr 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=286242</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>