<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (11) TMI 1752 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=286227</link>
    <description>The Tribunal remanded the matter back to the adjudicating authority for reevaluation of central excise duty on motor vehicles fabricated by the appellant for OEMs. The appellant&#039;s arguments regarding non-applicability of Rule 10A and entitlement to cum-duty benefit and VAT deduction were considered. The Tribunal directed a reevaluation without penalties, emphasizing the non-inclusion of taxes in the assessable value, following previous orders involving the same appellant.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 02 Nov 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Apr 2020 18:18:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=604236" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (11) TMI 1752 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=286227</link>
      <description>The Tribunal remanded the matter back to the adjudicating authority for reevaluation of central excise duty on motor vehicles fabricated by the appellant for OEMs. The appellant&#039;s arguments regarding non-applicability of Rule 10A and entitlement to cum-duty benefit and VAT deduction were considered. The Tribunal directed a reevaluation without penalties, emphasizing the non-inclusion of taxes in the assessable value, following previous orders involving the same appellant.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 02 Nov 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=286227</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>