<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (2) TMI 729 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=392285</link>
    <description>The court concluded that the petitioner was not entitled to a waiver of interest under Section 234B of the Income Tax Act. The court held that the petitioner failed to meet the conditions for waiver under the CBDT notification as they had accepted revised assessments and wrongly claimed losses, resulting in a failure to pay advance tax. The writ petitions were dismissed, and the order rejecting the waiver application was upheld.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 31 Jan 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 17 Feb 2020 09:07:59 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=604191" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (2) TMI 729 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=392285</link>
      <description>The court concluded that the petitioner was not entitled to a waiver of interest under Section 234B of the Income Tax Act. The court held that the petitioner failed to meet the conditions for waiver under the CBDT notification as they had accepted revised assessments and wrongly claimed losses, resulting in a failure to pay advance tax. The writ petitions were dismissed, and the order rejecting the waiver application was upheld.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 31 Jan 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=392285</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>