<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (2) TMI 716 - ITAT PUNE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=392272</link>
    <description>Interest received on land acquisition compensation was treated as taxable income under the specific charging provision for interest on enhanced compensation, following the Supreme Court ruling in Bikram Singh v. Land Acquisition Collector. The receipt was held to fall within section 56(2)(viii) of the Income-tax Act, so the addition was sustained and the taxpayer&#039;s challenge failed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 13 Feb 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 17 Feb 2020 09:07:20 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=604174" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (2) TMI 716 - ITAT PUNE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=392272</link>
      <description>Interest received on land acquisition compensation was treated as taxable income under the specific charging provision for interest on enhanced compensation, following the Supreme Court ruling in Bikram Singh v. Land Acquisition Collector. The receipt was held to fall within section 56(2)(viii) of the Income-tax Act, so the addition was sustained and the taxpayer&#039;s challenge failed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 13 Feb 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=392272</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>