<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (2) TMI 707 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=392263</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the appeal, dismissing the first ground regarding valuation under Section 50C but allowing the second ground on adopting State PWD rates for construction valuation. The decision emphasized the significance of fair market value and appropriate valuation rates in property assessments, directing the Valuation Officer to revalue based on State PWD rates.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 30 Dec 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 17 Feb 2020 09:06:59 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=604162" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (2) TMI 707 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=392263</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the appeal, dismissing the first ground regarding valuation under Section 50C but allowing the second ground on adopting State PWD rates for construction valuation. The decision emphasized the significance of fair market value and appropriate valuation rates in property assessments, directing the Valuation Officer to revalue based on State PWD rates.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 30 Dec 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=392263</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>