<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (2) TMI 687 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=392243</link>
    <description>The tax appeal under Section 35G of the Central Excise Act, 1944 was admitted on three substantial questions of law. The court permitted the withdrawal of the appeal to avail the benefit of the Sabka Vishwas [Legacy Dispute Resolution] Scheme, 2019, with the option to revive it if the appellant couldn&#039;t avail the scheme. The court disposed of the appeal as not pressed without expressing any opinion on the substantial questions of law raised, maintaining the option for further legal recourse if necessary.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 17 Jan 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 17 Feb 2020 09:05:17 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=604134" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (2) TMI 687 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=392243</link>
      <description>The tax appeal under Section 35G of the Central Excise Act, 1944 was admitted on three substantial questions of law. The court permitted the withdrawal of the appeal to avail the benefit of the Sabka Vishwas [Legacy Dispute Resolution] Scheme, 2019, with the option to revive it if the appellant couldn&#039;t avail the scheme. The court disposed of the appeal as not pressed without expressing any opinion on the substantial questions of law raised, maintaining the option for further legal recourse if necessary.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 17 Jan 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=392243</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>