<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>High Court Erred by Relying on Insufficiently Stamped Lease Deed; Overlooked Registrar&#039;s Report on Unpaid Stamp Duty and Penalty.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=51811</link>
    <description>Stamping of Lease deeds - The High Court has totally erred in relying on the lease deed dated 12.3.1997, which was found to be insufficiently stamped and brushing aside the report of the Registrar (Judicial), when the respondents had failed to pay the insufficient stamp duty and penalty as determined by the Registrar (Judicial) of the High Court of Karnataka</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 17 Feb 2020 09:04:40 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 17 Feb 2020 09:04:40 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=604121" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>High Court Erred by Relying on Insufficiently Stamped Lease Deed; Overlooked Registrar&#039;s Report on Unpaid Stamp Duty and Penalty.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=51811</link>
      <description>Stamping of Lease deeds - The High Court has totally erred in relying on the lease deed dated 12.3.1997, which was found to be insufficiently stamped and brushing aside the report of the Registrar (Judicial), when the respondents had failed to pay the insufficient stamp duty and penalty as determined by the Registrar (Judicial) of the High Court of Karnataka</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 17 Feb 2020 09:04:40 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=51811</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>